Social sponsoring, the other way to do marketing
A campaign buys attention for a few weeks. Social sponsoring buys a lasting association between your brand and a concrete result. What it gives, what it costs, who it suits.

The question always comes at budget time: "What do we get out of it, and how do we prove it?". A socialsponsoring can be measured, provided you separate what can be counted from what can be told, and do not inflate one with the other. This article gives the method the Kern4Good programme applies in its end-of-cohort reports, and a dashboard you can keep yourself.
An advertising campaign produces immediate, abundant figures: impressions, reach, clicks, cost per click. They reassure, and they are forgotten. A social sponsoring produces fewer figures, but each one matches something real: a website online, a logo in a precise place, a sentence said by an association to its members. Measuring means documenting those facts, then observing what they trigger, without converting a mention into an "advertising equivalent" nobody could verify.
The end-of-cohort report follows three levels, without mixing them, and it is the same framework public funders and foundations ask associations for:
Each counterpart announced in the pack is ticked, with the evidence. What could not be delivered is said, and replaced by an equivalent counterpart: a report that never flags a gap is not a report.
The associations' websites measure their audience with a consent-respecting tool. The report gives the visits of each website over six months, and the share that goes through the partners page or the page dedicated to your company. These figures are modest compared with a billboard campaign, and that is normal: an association's website speaks to a few thousand people a year, not millions. The difference lies in the quality of attention and in duration.
The publications by the associations and by KERN-IT that cite you, in the thank-you campaign and outside it: newsletters, social networks, activity report, a word at the general assembly. The report lists them with their date and their link when one exists. Shares and reactions are noted for information, without being added up into "reach".
The profile, the dedicated page, the visuals of the thank-you campaign, the association's sentence: all reusable content for you, in your annual report, your answers to ESG questionnaires or your careers page. Their value is not counted in visits but in production hours saved.
The requests received by your company that cite the programme, when you track them. It is the only figure that depends on you: without a tracking link or a question at reception ("how did you hear about us?"), it will stay empty.
An association explaining to its members that its new website exists thanks to you produces a voice you cannot buy any other way. That voice is documented: a quote in the report, a publication, a word at the general assembly. It is not counted, it is quoted, with the association's agreement and without rewriting it. It is often the part of the report your management remembers.
An honest measurement is made on fixed dates, known in advance, rather than when someone asks for a figure:
The ESG questionnaires of your clients and banks ask simple questions that a company without a structured programme answers poorly: which social action do you run, with which budget, which result, which evidence? The cohort report answers each one: the amount (means), the websites delivered (deliverables), the figures and testimonials (results), the dated screenshots (evidence). It slips as is into an appendix, and the association's sentence makes a better opening for an annual report than any figure.
If you want to follow your sponsoring yourself, five lines are enough, kept at the start, at the websites' go-live and six months later:
For the general framework, read Social sponsoring, the other way to do marketing. The packs and their counterparts are on the Companies page.
A cost per visit or per mention can be calculated and compared with other channels. But social sponsoring is judged on duration and credibility, two things a ratio does not show. The report gives the raw figures; you choose the ratio that speaks to your management.
At the end of the cohort, once the websites are online; a progress update is sent during the cohort. The six-month visit figures follow in a supplement.
Yes. They come from each website's measurement tool, and the report's screenshots are dated. On request, we show the tool in a meeting.
The report says so, and the counterpart is replaced by an equivalent one, agreed with you. A delayed website does not make the logo disappear: it postpones it.

A campaign buys attention for a few weeks. Social sponsoring buys a lasting association between your brand and a concrete result. What it gives, what it costs, who it suits.

Three words, three frameworks, three accounting treatments. What sets them apart, what Belgian law says, and which one to choose depending on what your company expects in return.

One task at a time, simple rules on data, a one-page AI policy and three uses that give time back to the field from the first week. A practical guide for a small team.
We would like to measure this site's audience (Google Analytics). No cookie is set without your consent, and refusing changes nothing to your visit. Learn more