Social sponsoring, the other way to do marketing
A campaign buys attention for a few weeks. Social sponsoring buys a lasting association between your brand and a concrete result. What it gives, what it costs, who it suits.

A company that wants to support an association hears three words that seem close: patronage, sponsoring, donation. They do not describe the same thing, and confusing them creates misunderstandings with accounting, the tax authority and the association itself. Here is the distinction, in plain terms, with what the Belgian framework says, and without tax advice: for your precise case, your accountant decides.
A donation is a sum or a good given without counterpart. The association thanks you, and that is all. In Belgium a tax reduction exists for cash donations, under three cumulative conditions: the beneficiary institution is approved by the FPS Finance (or recognised by law, like universities and public welfare centres), the donation reaches at least 40 EUR per year and per institution, and the institution issues a tax certificate. The FPS Finance publishes the list of approved institutions.
Since 1 January 2025 the tax reduction for individuals is 30% of the amount given, against 45% before, with a ceiling of 10% of total net income and a maximum amount indexed every year. For a company, gifts to an approved institution are deductible within 5% of taxable profit and a ceiling in euros (article 200 of the Income Tax Code). Most small associations are not approved: they can receive your donation, without tax benefit for you. It is legal, frequent, and worth knowing before promising anything to your finance director.
Patronage is support to a work or an organisation of general interest, with at most an acknowledgement: your name on a programme, a mention in an annual report, a line on a panel. The counterpart stays symbolic, out of proportion with the amount paid. Belgian law has no tax status of its own for patronage: it is treated as a gift, with the same approval conditions if a tax benefit is sought.
Skills patronage (days of your staff made available to an association) follows the same logic: it gives rise to no invoice and is not deducted as an advertising expense.
Sponsoring is a commercial contract. You pay, the organisation makes you visible according to written counterparts: logo, mentions, dedicated page, presence in its communication, public thanks. It is a service, invoiced with VAT, that you treat as a marketing expense, deductible as such because it serves your business. The association that invoices a sponsoring carries out, for that operation, an economic activity: it must check its own VAT regime, which a small non-profit sometimes ignores.
Social sponsoring follows this framework, with one particularity: the sponsored project is of general interest and produces a lasting result (a website that stays online, a better-equipped association), and that result is what gives your visibility its credibility. The glossary defines social sponsoring and the counterpart.
The line is judged on the proportion between what you pay and what you receive. A mention in an annual report against 5 000 EUR is still patronage; a logo on five websites, a dedicated page and a thank-you campaign against 5 000 EUR is sponsoring. The tax authority and your auditor look at that proportion, not at the word you wrote at the top of the contract.
The word chosen decides the accounting line. A sponsoring is an advertising and public relations expense: it is deductible as a professional expense because it serves the business, and the VAT invoiced by the association is recoverable depending on your regime. A donation or a patronage is a gift: it is not a deductible expense, it follows the gifts regime (capped deduction if the institution is approved, disallowed expense otherwise). Two practical consequences:
For the association the mirror is true: a sponsoring is an activity income, sometimes subject to VAT; a donation is an income without counterpart, outside VAT. That is why the same sum cannot be "a bit of both".
The choice is not only about you. For the association, a donation is free money, without obligation; a sponsoring is a commitment: it must deliver the counterparts, keep the logo online, cite the sponsor, sometimes invoice with VAT. A small association without an experienced treasurer sometimes prefers a more modest donation to a higher sponsoring. In a programme like Kern4Good, that burden is carried by the programme: KERN-IT invoices, places the counterparts and writes the report; the association relays and thanks.
The programme works as social sponsoring: KERN-IT invoices the packs, the counterparts are written, the end-of-cohort report proves their delivery. It issues no tax certificate and collects no donations: KERN-IT is a company, not an approved institution. When Kern4Good becomes an association, this framework will evolve, and it will be said on the Impact hub page. The packs and their counterparts are on the Companies page.
Pages consulted on 19 September 2026. Rates, ceilings and percentages change: check the update date of each page before building a budget on it.
Yes, with three distinct frameworks and three distinct documents. Many companies do sponsoring for their brand and patronage or donations for their convictions.
It is different. The association receives a website at cost funded by your pack, and you receive written visibility. Both win, and that is what makes the relationship last.
No. The 30% rate is the tax reduction for individuals. For a company, gifts to an approved institution are deductible within 5% of taxable profit and a ceiling in euros. Your accountant confirms what applies to your financial year.
Yes, it is a service. It must then check its VAT regime, which its accountant or its sector federation can do. In Kern4Good, KERN-IT invoices, not the association.

A campaign buys attention for a few weeks. Social sponsoring buys a lasting association between your brand and a concrete result. What it gives, what it costs, who it suits.

What can be counted (visits, mentions, content), what can be told (the associations' voice), and how the end-of-cohort report puts both together without exaggerating. With a sample dashboard.

One task at a time, simple rules on data, a one-page AI policy and three uses that give time back to the field from the first week. A practical guide for a small team.
We would like to measure this site's audience (Google Analytics). No cookie is set without your consent, and refusing changes nothing to your visit. Learn more